Bizarre space signals scientists detected that were never explained
Governments and agencies release new footage of unexplained aerial phenomena now almost routinely, and every release sparks the same question about what’s really out there. The more grounded version of that question has a long scientific record behind it: real instruments, real detections, and a short list of signals nobody has fully explained.
Four below, each one documented, none of them settled.
Fast radio bursts
In 2007, astronomers reviewing archival data found a single, enormously bright flash of radio waves lasting a few milliseconds, apparently from billions of light-years away. Since then, astronomers have observed more than 800 similar sources, some repeating, and the underlying physics still isn’t resolved. Researchers openly describe the sources and their emission mechanism as unclear.
Microwave ovens
Not a typo. For years, a second class of FRB-lookalike signals showed up at the Parkes telescope in Australia, nicknamed perytons, and puzzled astronomers badly enough that some speculated all FRBs might be artificial. The culprit, once traced, was a microwave oven in the observatory, with signals clustering around lunchtime.
‘Oumuamua accelerated on its way out of the solar system, and nothing visible explains why
Discovered in October 2017, it was the first confirmed object to arrive from interstellar space. Its motion showed a measurable non-gravitational push at 30-sigma significance, yet no gas or dust trail appeared that could account for it. Researchers have proposed an ultra-thin shape, a hydrogen-venting ice body, even a cosmic “dust bunny,” but every explanation has its shortcomings.
Three sightings, about a minute each, at the exact same frequency every time
SHGb02+14a showed up in SETI@home data in 2003 at roughly 1420 MHz, the same frequency hydrogen emits. It was observed on three separate occasions for about a minute each time, and project scientists dismissed the alien interpretation almost immediately, though they still couldn’t fully rule out ground interference.
The bottom line
Every item here has real data behind it and a real scientist’s name attached to the investigation. What none of them has is a final answer, which is exactly why they keep resurfacing every time someone asks what’s really out there.
Ask us! What questions do you have about content, strategy, pop culture, lifestyle, wellness, history or more? We may use your question in an upcoming article!
Related:
- Historical “discoveries” that turned out to be elaborate hoaxes
- Some of the most surprising record deals in music history
Like MediaFeed’s content? Be sure to follow us.
This article was syndicated by MediaFeed.co.
