Eighteen years ago, while raising my two young towheaded children, I embarked on a month of consumer celibacy, writing about it for the NRDC’s OnEarth magazine. I was practicing a miniature version of “The Compact,” a social experiment in which 10 San Francisco-area friends stopped buying anything new for a year. Before long, the idea became a global movement to reduce one’s personal footprint. Mind you, this was before social media turned unboxing into a spectator sport—via influencers, literal monkeys, and Amazon packages arriving with the speed and frequency of a minor haunting. And this was before Shein and Temu became the fast-fashion tornadoes of our era, flinging out clothes, gadgets, and tiny plastic temptations at a pace that makes a normal shopping habit feel almost quaint.
Times have changed since then, with the advent of social media, Amazon’s one-click shopping, and the uber-cheap Chinese mega-brands that—if not for ourselves with our more refined tastes—allow our kids or grandkids to “shop like billionaires.” They’re happy, we’re happy. What do we have to lose?
The Cost of Looking Good
I hate to admit, but I do love shopping. I love scrolling my Insta feed late at night, and—what’s this?—a personalized family tree necklace that’ll make a perfect gift for my adopted daughter. Or remembering I need to buy a mask for her masquerade ball; click-click, it arrives two days later. But when I watched Netflix’s Buy Now documentary, it reminded me of my Compact month, which, at the time, reset my lifelong personal desire to leave a positive legacy on the planet. Am I in need of another reset?
Even though a little retail therapy makes the heart happy, the earth isn’t happy. What’s more, we may be hastening the onset of cancers, neurological disorders, and other health issues by exposing our bodies to them: Some imported shoes, handbags, and children’s products have been found to contain lead and other chemicals at levels that alarmed regulators.
Truth be told, Temu and Shein aren’t just fast fashion, they’re “ultra-fast fashion.” And for those concerned about the cradle-to-grave life cycle of their products, ultra-fast fashion should give us pause. Shein’s churn is on another planet: One researcher counted roughly 1.3 million new items over a 12-month period. This drives the conditions employees face: working up to 12 hours in unsafe factories, being exposed to harmful chemicals, and, in some cases, being prevented from organizing to fight for better conditions.
Want more? Get PROVOKED’s free Thursday newsletter. Sign up at PROVOKEDMagazine.com.
The People Speak
When I asked people their thoughts on ultra-fast fashion, answers were across the board. “I have bought all of my summer dresses from Shein and love them!” said Wendi Richardson, Community Director for Legacy Learning, a nonprofit in Boone River Valley, Iowa. “My daughter buys most of her pants and skirts, as well as shoes [from Shein]. It works.”
“I have bought from [Shein and Temu] but don’t any more. The quality is poor, and the fabrics are usually a cheap synthetic,” said Kellie Snider, an artist and retired animal behaviorist in Pittsburgh. “[But] I have had some really good luck with shoes.”
While arguably better quality than clothing, the shoes have a dark side. Authorities in South Korea tested Shein and Temu imports in 2024, finding sandals with 10 times the admissible limit of lead and other shoes with 428 times the country’s allowable levels of phthalates, endocrine-disrupting chemicals that can cause reproductive harm. (Related: The Thrift Store Is My Midlife Rebellion)
Then there’s the increasing omnipresence of microplastics, tiny shards of different types of plastics that have been found from the top of Mount Everest to the guts, lungs, and brains of humans. More than a third come from synthetic fabrics like polyester, nylon, and acrylic. As clothing designer Roger Lee said in Buy Now, “We are eating our clothes.” And inhaling them, which is worse: Digestion allows you to eliminate microplastics, but inhalation can lodge them inside your organs. We are becoming human-plastic chimeras.
The End of the Line
“Fast fashion is hard on every segment of the world that it touches,” said Susan Stillman, a Houston realtor. “When I was a young mother, my father sent me a newspaper article about donating clothes that said that [after] they have served us, they need to serve someone else, with dignity,” adding that it’s almost impossible to donate fast fashion because it doesn’t hold up, and it doesn’t make her feel good to wear.
After its life cycle at thrift stores ends, America exports nearly 800,000 tons of donated clothing each year, much to Africa. This has made it economically challenging for African designers to develop their fashion industries, despite bold colors, artistic fabrics, and a history of design innovation. Ghana alone imports 15 million items of used clothing weekly; Accra’s Sankofa beach is clogged with layers and layers of discarded clothing.
“I would rather buy from companies who are transparent about where they source their materials, use recycled or organic fabrics, and make sure their garments are created in factories with safe conditions and living wages,” said Stillman.
Enjoyed this story? Read more from PROVOKED at provokedmagazine.com.
Wait, Are Sweatshops Actually Good?
In the 1990s and 2000s, economist Paul Krugman and Pulitzer Prize-winning New York Times columnist Nick Kristof both advocated for sweatshops. After visiting Cambodia, Kristof argued that the alternatives could be harsher: picking through toxic dumps, extreme deprivation, or other forms of exploitation. Both he and Krugman, along with the conservative Ben Powell, Director of the Free Market Institute at Texas Tech University, took the argument further, stating that these garment factories can help both individuals and nations rise out of poverty.
Wait, what? I had just reread The Jungle, a novel about Lithuanian immigrants working in meat factories in the early 1900s when American conditions approximated some countries we now import from. Based on real circumstances, the novel led to major reforms. At first, young Jurgis is overjoyed to work night and day chasing the American dream. But after a series of heartbreaking circumstances—including a deceptive home lender, workplace exploitation, and relentless bad luck—the family ends up worse off than when they began.
However, there is economic evidence that sweatshops can help nations rise from the wreckage of poverty—with some guardrails. “Sweatshops are one of the first steps up the ladder out of poverty. Workers take these jobs because they are better than the available alternatives,” Powell told me. “For many, it’s a step up from informal agricultural work, pays better, and often has better conditions.”
America’s Industrial Revolution did result in jobs, innovation, and an emerging middle class, but that occurred in a country with a strong Constitution. Workers unionized to fight collectively for better conditions.
While arguments for sweatshops may carry some weight, they aren’t without detractors. “A smaller number of garment supremos and dominant brands have accrued incredible private wealth,” said Lucy Siegle, author of “To Die For: Is Fashion Wearing Out the World?” “Trickle-down economics does not work in the garment industry. All of the opportunity is centered in the upper stratosphere in this supply chain. All of the risk is at the bottom.”
Whatever you make of the economic argument, the grotesque waste and chemical byproducts of ultra-fast fashion have me leaning hard toward a no. In the end, I like Stillman’s 30 wears rule. “Ask yourself, ‘Will I wear this 30 times?’” she said, with 300 or 3,000 even better. If the answer isn’t yes, close the tab. Your closet, your wallet, and the planet will probably survive without it.”
Related:
- The Fastest-Growing Entrepreneurs in the World? Women Over 50.
- The Things I Carried Nearly Killed Me
- Is Car Rotting the New Self-Care?
Ask us! What questions do you have about content, strategy, pop culture, lifestyle, wellness, history or more? We may use your question in an upcoming article!
Like MediaFeed’s content? Be sure to follow us.
This article originally appeared on PROVOKED and was syndicated by MediaFeed.co.
