Yes, a university esports program can support student recruitment and retention, particularly when it gives prospective students something distinctive to discover and enrolled students a reason to stay involved. But I’d be careful with claims that adding esports automatically produces enrollment growth. The program still has to be good, visible, and connected to the larger campus experience.
Esports Can Give Students Another Reason to Choose a University
A high school student who already competes in esports may actively look for colleges where that can continue. Other students may notice the gaming facility, recreational program, broadcasting opportunities, or esports club and realize the university has a community built around something they already care about.
The audience is also much larger than a varsity roster. Prospective students may be interested in broadcasting, marketing, event production, technology, cybersecurity, game design, content creation, or recreational gaming. For admissions, that makes esports potentially relevant to students who may never consider participating in traditional athletics.
The important part is connecting that interest with the actual recruitment process. Campus tours can visit the facility, coaches and student leaders can participate in admitted-student events, and high school tournaments or summer camps can introduce students to campus before they apply. If recruitment is one reason the university invested in esports, admissions should be involved from the beginning.
Measure What Happens After the Tournament
This is where I think universities sometimes get ahead of themselves. Hosting a tournament with 150 prospective students sounds impressive, but attendance isn’t enrollment.
The more useful question is what those students do afterward. How many requests, schedule another visit, apply, deposit, and eventually enroll? Admissions teams can track those interactions in the same way they measure other recruitment activities and begin separating students who simply attended an event from those whose college decision was actually influenced by esports.
That connects directly with our earlier discussion about building a business case for university esports. If recruitment is part of the justification for the investment, the university should decide how it will measure that before the facility opens rather than trying to reconstruct the numbers later.
Retention May Be the More Interesting Opportunity
Recruitment gets students onto campus. Retention depends on what happens after they arrive, and this may be where esports has an even more interesting role.
A 2025 national study involving collegiate esports participants found that more than 94% intended to complete their degrees. The University of Oklahoma, which participated in the research, also reported a 97% retention rate among students in its esports development programs in spring 2024.
Those numbers are encouraging, but we shouldn’t turn correlation into causation. Students participating in esports may differ from students who don’t, and researchers are still examining the relationship between esports, academic success, belonging, and persistence.
What interests me more is why students stay involved. A 2026 University of Arkansas study examining esports programs at Arkansas and Oklahoma found that students were motivated by connection, identity, and belonging, and that institutional support helped shape their experience.
A student might initially show up because they play Valorant or Rocket League, then find themselves running an event, learning broadcast production, mentoring another player, or becoming part of a group they see several times each week. That’s where esports starts looking less like an amenity and more like part of campus life.
A Gaming Room by Itself Won’t Accomplish Much
There is an important counterpoint. Thirty gaming computers don’t automatically create a successful student community, and more time spent gaming isn’t necessarily better.
Research involving 490 collegiate recreational esports participants found that problematic gaming was associated with poorer mental well-being, sleep, and social connection, although total gaming hours alone did not predict mental-health outcomes. Universities still need leadership, codes of conduct, inclusive programming, healthy expectations, and opportunities for students to interact beyond simply sitting beside one another wearing headsets.
In other words, the people and programming matter more than the RGB lighting.
Recruitment and Retention Should Be Measured Separately
If a university wants to know whether esports is working, I’d treat recruitment and retention as two different outcomes. Recruitment can be measured through inquiries, visits, applications, deposits, and enrolled students who identify esports as an influence. Retention can look at year-to-year persistence among participants alongside academic progress, engagement, and continued involvement.
The evidence around collegiate esports is getting better, but universities shouldn’t promise results the research can’t prove. Esports can help prospective students discover a university and give enrolled students meaningful ways to participate once they arrive.
That’s a much more defensible value proposition than promising that an esports arena will magically increase enrollment. Build a program students actually want to be part of, connect it with admissions and campus life, and then measure what happens.
Related:
Like MediaFeed’s content? Be sure to follow us.
This article originally appeared on ESportSupply.com and was syndicated by MediaFeed.co
